<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;ll start rolling in any minute now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwpaine</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18225</link>
		<dc:creator>jwpaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 19:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18225</guid>
		<description>Allow me to formally establish the &lt;i&gt;lex grammatica&lt;/i&gt; of the &quot;Holy Fucking Shit!&quot; spike in traffic phenomena.

Commonly abbreviated HFS!, it is a superlative and therefore cannot be modified (for instance, &quot;maximum HFS!&quot; is incorrect, but &quot;nearly HFS!&quot;, while considered by purists to be common and vulgar, is not).

Also, note the &quot;!&quot; in &quot;HFS!&quot; This is required to differentiate HFS! from the more mundane acronyms for Health &amp; Family Services, Hierarchical File System, or Historic Fort Snelling. It does not indicate an excited mode of speech; rather, it is pronounced as a glottal stop, such as what one would hear at the beginning of an gulp of abject fear, as an audible precursor to the gag reflex, or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to formally establish the <i>lex grammatica</i> of the &#8220;Holy Fucking Shit!&#8221; spike in traffic phenomena.</p>
<p>Commonly abbreviated HFS!, it is a superlative and therefore cannot be modified (for instance, &#8220;maximum HFS!&#8221; is incorrect, but &#8220;nearly HFS!&#8221;, while considered by purists to be common and vulgar, is not).</p>
<p>Also, note the &#8220;!&#8221; in &#8220;HFS!&#8221; This is required to differentiate HFS! from the more mundane acronyms for Health &amp; Family Services, Hierarchical File System, or Historic Fort Snelling. It does not indicate an excited mode of speech; rather, it is pronounced as a glottal stop, such as what one would hear at the beginning of an gulp of abject fear, as an audible precursor to the gag reflex, or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwpaine</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18150</link>
		<dc:creator>jwpaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 17:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18150</guid>
		<description>Steam:

More than likely. Even some legitimate spiders (cough*Yahoo*cough) have to be told to meter their visits; otherwise they act like a reverse firehose and suck up HUGE chunks of your data &amp; bandwidth in seconds.

The email harvesters (and comment/forum spammers) are pretty easy to catch, since they will follow every link they find on your page, despite a robots.txt prohibition of same. So whenever anyone visits a page on one of my sites named, oh, emailaddresses.asp (specifically flagged DISALLOW in the site&#039;s robots.txt), their IP is automatically added to a private DB (one used to check a visitor&#039;s IP &lt;i&gt;on every  visit&lt;/i&gt;). From that point on, visits from that IP are redirected to a 14-byte page containing simply &quot;access denied.&quot; If the bot still persists in megavisits, I manually ban the IP from accessing the site entirely.

If you&#039;re having serious problems with harvesters/bots, you may want to join &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.projecthoneypot.org/home.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Project Honeypot&lt;/a&gt;. There&#039;s a whole culture out there in innertubeland dedicated to tracking and driving a stake through the hearts of harvesters/commentbots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steam:</p>
<p>More than likely. Even some legitimate spiders (cough*Yahoo*cough) have to be told to meter their visits; otherwise they act like a reverse firehose and suck up HUGE chunks of your data &#038; bandwidth in seconds.</p>
<p>The email harvesters (and comment/forum spammers) are pretty easy to catch, since they will follow every link they find on your page, despite a robots.txt prohibition of same. So whenever anyone visits a page on one of my sites named, oh, emailaddresses.asp (specifically flagged DISALLOW in the site&#8217;s robots.txt), their IP is automatically added to a private DB (one used to check a visitor&#8217;s IP <i>on every  visit</i>). From that point on, visits from that IP are redirected to a 14-byte page containing simply &#8220;access denied.&#8221; If the bot still persists in megavisits, I manually ban the IP from accessing the site entirely.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re having serious problems with harvesters/bots, you may want to join <a href="http://www.projecthoneypot.org/home.php" rel="nofollow">Project Honeypot</a>. There&#8217;s a whole culture out there in innertubeland dedicated to tracking and driving a stake through the hearts of harvesters/commentbots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cranky</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18144</link>
		<dc:creator>cranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18144</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I wanted to put sitemeter in at my place, but I believe the EULA has a li’l line something about “no adult material or porn sites”. &lt;/em&gt;

McGoo&#039;s got adult material?  I&#039;ll be back .... much later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I wanted to put sitemeter in at my place, but I believe the EULA has a li’l line something about “no adult material or porn sites”. </em></p>
<p>McGoo&#8217;s got adult material?  I&#8217;ll be back &#8230;. much later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steamboat McGoo</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18139</link>
		<dc:creator>Steamboat McGoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18139</guid>
		<description>jwp - you may have just answered a question I&#039;ve had for quite some time.

A while back, my site had a sudden huge (to me) burst of hit activity. We&#039;re talking 500-600 hits in an hour or less for NO REASON. Then it completely stopped. I happened to be watching at the time and did not understand why/where/who was doing this.

So was it a spider or &#039;bot or two taking a sudden interest in me, and then moving on - or being blocked (finally) by WordPress?

On Great Britain politics: Obviously I&#039;m not gonna &#039;get it&#039; in one easy lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jwp &#8211; you may have just answered a question I&#8217;ve had for quite some time.</p>
<p>A while back, my site had a sudden huge (to me) burst of hit activity. We&#8217;re talking 500-600 hits in an hour or less for NO REASON. Then it completely stopped. I happened to be watching at the time and did not understand why/where/who was doing this.</p>
<p>So was it a spider or &#8216;bot or two taking a sudden interest in me, and then moving on &#8211; or being blocked (finally) by WordPress?</p>
<p>On Great Britain politics: Obviously I&#8217;m not gonna &#8216;get it&#8217; in one easy lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwpaine</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18137</link>
		<dc:creator>jwpaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18137</guid>
		<description>bmac:

Sitemeter filters out spiders and email harvesters. I manage sites that often take &lt;i&gt;thousands&lt;/i&gt; of hits in an hour (from  harvesters and spiders) and sitemeter will show just the couple hundred &quot;legitimate&quot; visits.

I&#039;m happy that spiders like google and yahoo, et al, visit the various sites I manage, but I&#039;ve written a &quot;bot-trap&quot; that logs the IP of harvesters and redirects them to a gotcha! page (forever).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bmac:</p>
<p>Sitemeter filters out spiders and email harvesters. I manage sites that often take <i>thousands</i> of hits in an hour (from  harvesters and spiders) and sitemeter will show just the couple hundred &#8220;legitimate&#8221; visits.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy that spiders like google and yahoo, et al, visit the various sites I manage, but I&#8217;ve written a &#8220;bot-trap&#8221; that logs the IP of harvesters and redirects them to a gotcha! page (forever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EW1(SG)</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18129</link>
		<dc:creator>EW1(SG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18129</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The egregious George Galloway lost, big time.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Yeah, yeah.  Galloway, McDermott.  No wonder I got &#039;em confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The egregious George Galloway lost, big time.</p></blockquote>
<p> Yeah, yeah.  Galloway, McDermott.  No wonder I got &#8216;em confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Weasel</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18121</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18121</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s hard to figure out what&#039;s what, McGoo. I always find it hard to work out the UK political scene, no doubt because I&#039;m a ferriner. It&#039;s not perfectly analogous to Dem/Repub.

The egregious George Galloway lost, big time. And the BNP picked up a seat. They&#039;re kind of like the Klan party, so it&#039;s not good news. But it is a measure of discontent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s hard to figure out what&#8217;s what, McGoo. I always find it hard to work out the UK political scene, no doubt because I&#8217;m a ferriner. It&#8217;s not perfectly analogous to Dem/Repub.</p>
<p>The egregious George Galloway lost, big time. And the BNP picked up a seat. They&#8217;re kind of like the Klan party, so it&#8217;s not good news. But it is a measure of discontent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steamboat McGoo</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18119</link>
		<dc:creator>Steamboat McGoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18119</guid>
		<description>Damn. I was (naively) hoping the leftward tilt of GB government was being corrected a bit. No such luck.

Sounds like you got a bunch of  &#039;McCains&#039; in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn. I was (naively) hoping the leftward tilt of GB government was being corrected a bit. No such luck.</p>
<p>Sounds like you got a bunch of  &#8216;McCains&#8217; in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Weasel</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18118</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 11:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18118</guid>
		<description>How dreadful is Cameron? He snubbed Maggie so hard she fucked off to Downing Street and had tea with Gordon Brown, just to poke a finger in his eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How dreadful is Cameron? He snubbed Maggie so hard she fucked off to Downing Street and had tea with Gordon Brown, just to poke a finger in his eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Badger</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/1119/comment-page-1#comment-18116</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 11:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/1119#comment-18116</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a damned shame, McGoo, that&#039;s what it is. 

Panicked by years in the wilderness, the Tory high-ups put a bland, Leftist, Greenie airhead in charge of the party (David Cameron) just as the public had finally begun to realise what a pack of liars, whores, pimps, cheats and criminals were running the show.

As the Tories have finally kicked Labour out of office in town halls across the land, people are wrongly attributing that success to the adoption of Leftist Greenie polices when, in fact, it was simply down to timing.

I&#039;m glad Boris won London (Livingstone is Stalinist filth of the very highest order) but he is  a loose cannon and could do great harm. 

So what we have here is the right result for the wrong people. Unless Mr McBean&#039;s government collapses early, we won&#039;t get the chance for a  real change for another two years. Between now and then expect a full-on attack on the Tories from the UK media (led by the thoroughly politically corrupt BBC). 

Personally, I think they will fail to save Labour, whose stock is at a record low, and I think the Tories will win the next election - but they will be Tories in name only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a damned shame, McGoo, that&#8217;s what it is. </p>
<p>Panicked by years in the wilderness, the Tory high-ups put a bland, Leftist, Greenie airhead in charge of the party (David Cameron) just as the public had finally begun to realise what a pack of liars, whores, pimps, cheats and criminals were running the show.</p>
<p>As the Tories have finally kicked Labour out of office in town halls across the land, people are wrongly attributing that success to the adoption of Leftist Greenie polices when, in fact, it was simply down to timing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad Boris won London (Livingstone is Stalinist filth of the very highest order) but he is  a loose cannon and could do great harm. </p>
<p>So what we have here is the right result for the wrong people. Unless Mr McBean&#8217;s government collapses early, we won&#8217;t get the chance for a  real change for another two years. Between now and then expect a full-on attack on the Tories from the UK media (led by the thoroughly politically corrupt BBC). </p>
<p>Personally, I think they will fail to save Labour, whose stock is at a record low, and I think the Tories will win the next election &#8211; but they will be Tories in name only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

