<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cussing works!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric Locke</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-47112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-47112</guid>
		<description>lauraw and EW1 have it right. &quot;Representative&quot; or &quot;Operator&quot; often work, though not always. You do have to be persistent enough to let the robot work its way through the whole decision tree, which can take a while. It&#039;s also possible to mix approaches. &quot;F* YOU! &lt;em&gt;REPRESENTATIVE!&lt;/EM&gt;&quot; can get the job done when the others don&#039;t, especially when you&#039;re three or four deep into the hierarchy.

Cussing at the live operators doesn&#039;t help. I&#039;m really a bit surprised there isn&#039;t a Web site for clips from irate and/or stupid, confused, or simply insane calls to Phone Support. At one company I knew of, telephone support people were trained by having to put up with a deliberately constructed call that mixed cluelessness, profanity, insults profane and otherwise, and sexual harassment in a way that ought to be funny, but ended up being painful. I guarantee you can&#039;t do better.

BTW what&#039;s an EW1(SG)? I don&#039;t remember comm intercepts or radar characterization in Stargate...

Regards,
Ric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lauraw and EW1 have it right. &#8220;Representative&#8221; or &#8220;Operator&#8221; often work, though not always. You do have to be persistent enough to let the robot work its way through the whole decision tree, which can take a while. It&#8217;s also possible to mix approaches. &#8220;F* YOU! <em>REPRESENTATIVE!</em>&#8221; can get the job done when the others don&#8217;t, especially when you&#8217;re three or four deep into the hierarchy.</p>
<p>Cussing at the live operators doesn&#8217;t help. I&#8217;m really a bit surprised there isn&#8217;t a Web site for clips from irate and/or stupid, confused, or simply insane calls to Phone Support. At one company I knew of, telephone support people were trained by having to put up with a deliberately constructed call that mixed cluelessness, profanity, insults profane and otherwise, and sexual harassment in a way that ought to be funny, but ended up being painful. I guarantee you can&#8217;t do better.</p>
<p>BTW what&#8217;s an EW1(SG)? I don&#8217;t remember comm intercepts or radar characterization in Stargate&#8230;</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Ric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-47024</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 04:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-47024</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re using mycheckfree.com try emailing checkfreebillpay@customercenter.net.  God knows if it&#039;ll work but since I have to work with Checkfree daily there&#039;s a better than even chance you&#039;ll get someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re using mycheckfree.com try emailing <a href="mailto:checkfreebillpay@customercenter.net">checkfreebillpay@customercenter.net</a>.  God knows if it&#8217;ll work but since I have to work with Checkfree daily there&#8217;s a better than even chance you&#8217;ll get someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can't hark my cry</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-46959</link>
		<dc:creator>Can't hark my cry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-46959</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have been getting a lot of those “please hold for an operator” when they call me these days. I hang up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don&#039;t answer the phone if I don&#039;t recognize the number on the caller I.D.  So every so often, when the answering machine picks up on one of those 800 numbers I am ignoring, the recorded message is &quot;Your call did not go through as dialed.  Please hang up and dial your call again.&quot;  If I&#039;m not here to go over and manually hang up on it, it will go on for the full 3 minutes my answering machine allows for a message (I have long-winded friends, and longer-winded family).  I just can&#039;t figure out what on earth the geniuses who programmed that particular autodialler thought they were up to. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have been getting a lot of those “please hold for an operator” when they call me these days. I hang up.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t answer the phone if I don&#8217;t recognize the number on the caller I.D.  So every so often, when the answering machine picks up on one of those 800 numbers I am ignoring, the recorded message is &#8220;Your call did not go through as dialed.  Please hang up and dial your call again.&#8221;  If I&#8217;m not here to go over and manually hang up on it, it will go on for the full 3 minutes my answering machine allows for a message (I have long-winded friends, and longer-winded family).  I just can&#8217;t figure out what on earth the geniuses who programmed that particular autodialler thought they were up to. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauraw</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-46890</link>
		<dc:creator>lauraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-46890</guid>
		<description>Usually just saying &#039;Rep&#039; or &#039;Representative&#039; works for me. It&#039;s a fucking shame that I&#039;m terrified of using bad language with anybody but friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually just saying &#8216;Rep&#8217; or &#8216;Representative&#8217; works for me. It&#8217;s a fucking shame that I&#8217;m terrified of using bad language with anybody but friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-46868</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-46868</guid>
		<description>Best thing I read on the Internet today. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best thing I read on the Internet today. <img src='http://sweasel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EW1(SG)</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-46862</link>
		<dc:creator>EW1(SG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-46862</guid>
		<description>Seems like a waste of harsh language to use it on a machine.  But I did learn a new trick along the same line just yesterday:  many of the robots are programmed to recognize &quot;Operator!,&quot; who &lt;em&gt;then&lt;/em&gt; gets the stream of invective saved for a real person!

And I&#039;m gonna sit on hold because your machine called me?

I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a waste of harsh language to use it on a machine.  But I did learn a new trick along the same line just yesterday:  many of the robots are programmed to recognize &#8220;Operator!,&#8221; who <em>then</em> gets the stream of invective saved for a real person!</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m gonna sit on hold because your machine called me?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-46861</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-46861</guid>
		<description>I have been getting a lot of those &quot;please hold for an operator&quot; when they call me these days. I hang up. If they don&#039;t have time to have a real person on the line when I answer, then I don&#039;t have time to talk to them. They eventually send a letter if they can&#039;t get you on the phone. :) Also, I&#039;ve noticed a lot of the robot boy calls I get lately just hang up if you answer and say nothing right away. I guess they assume it is a machine or something. Hah! A machine that hangs up on machines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been getting a lot of those &#8220;please hold for an operator&#8221; when they call me these days. I hang up. If they don&#8217;t have time to have a real person on the line when I answer, then I don&#8217;t have time to talk to them. They eventually send a letter if they can&#8217;t get you on the phone. <img src='http://sweasel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Also, I&#8217;ve noticed a lot of the robot boy calls I get lately just hang up if you answer and say nothing right away. I guess they assume it is a machine or something. Hah! A machine that hangs up on machines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surly ermine</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-46860</link>
		<dc:creator>surly ermine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-46860</guid>
		<description>Fucking fantastic! Thanks Weas! Now where&#039;d I put that number for Time-Warner? Pardon the french, just warmin&#039; up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fucking fantastic! Thanks Weas! Now where&#8217;d I put that number for Time-Warner? Pardon the french, just warmin&#8217; up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pupster</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-46859</link>
		<dc:creator>Pupster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-46859</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s word recognition, or more tone and volume.  That&#039;s why I keep air-horns in strategic places around Pupster manor.  

My bank has started calling ME via robot and then asking ME to hold for the next available operator.  *seething* 
The next available operator does not have a good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s word recognition, or more tone and volume.  That&#8217;s why I keep air-horns in strategic places around Pupster manor.  </p>
<p>My bank has started calling ME via robot and then asking ME to hold for the next available operator.  *seething*<br />
The next available operator does not have a good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Weasel</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/5589/comment-page-1#comment-46858</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/?p=5589#comment-46858</guid>
		<description>I came to atheism by way of the church, Gregory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came to atheism by way of the church, Gregory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

