<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Wiper for Every Need</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweasel.com/archives/609/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TattooedIntellectual</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-6012</link>
		<dc:creator>TattooedIntellectual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-6012</guid>
		<description>American English is full of slang.  And most of it Aussies and Kiwis do not always get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American English is full of slang.  And most of it Aussies and Kiwis do not always get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muslihoon</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-6003</link>
		<dc:creator>Muslihoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-6003</guid>
		<description>I find that British English (English English?) contains a lot of slang. It is seems to be quite ubiquitous. (Unless, I assume, one is using The Queen&#039;s English.)

Brits: do you find American English to be slangish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that British English (English English?) contains a lot of slang. It is seems to be quite ubiquitous. (Unless, I assume, one is using The Queen&#8217;s English.)</p>
<p>Brits: do you find American English to be slangish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Weasel</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-5999</guid>
		<description>Uncle B does, but he watched too much Buffy and it went to his head. He could probably advise on rhyming slang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle B does, but he watched too much Buffy and it went to his head. He could probably advise on rhyming slang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Peel</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-5998</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Peel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-5998</guid>
		<description>ooh, now we&#039;re talking.

Have I mentioned that one of my coworkers is a Brit?  I keep deliberately using Britishisms around him, but I don&#039;t think he&#039;s noticed.  I should start using Cockney rhyming slang and see if he notices that.  Next month, I&#039;m going to ask him what he plans on doing for Bonfire Night.

(I think I would definitely notice if I were in England and a native Brit used a bunch of Americanisms...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooh, now we&#8217;re talking.</p>
<p>Have I mentioned that one of my coworkers is a Brit?  I keep deliberately using Britishisms around him, but I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s noticed.  I should start using Cockney rhyming slang and see if he notices that.  Next month, I&#8217;m going to ask him what he plans on doing for Bonfire Night.</p>
<p>(I think I would definitely notice if I were in England and a native Brit used a bunch of Americanisms&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Weasel</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-5993</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-5993</guid>
		<description>I always thought &quot;the hardware labs and also the chemistry labs too which are totally, totally different labs&quot; had a nice ring to it.

At least I&#039;m glad to hear Kimwipes found a good home and won&#039;t go extinct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought &#8220;the hardware labs and also the chemistry labs too which are totally, totally different labs&#8221; had a nice ring to it.</p>
<p>At least I&#8217;m glad to hear Kimwipes found a good home and won&#8217;t go extinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Peel</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-5992</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Peel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-5992</guid>
		<description>We use Kimwipes in the hardware labs and the chemistry labs at work.

(Is there a better way to write the above that still makes clear that I&#039;m talking about two separate types of labs?  &quot;The hardware and chemistry labs&quot; sounds like I&#039;m talking about several labs for both hardware and chemistry, or else two labs, one of each, neither of which is correct.  &quot;The hardware and the chemistry labs,&quot; maybe?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use Kimwipes in the hardware labs and the chemistry labs at work.</p>
<p>(Is there a better way to write the above that still makes clear that I&#8217;m talking about two separate types of labs?  &#8220;The hardware and chemistry labs&#8221; sounds like I&#8217;m talking about several labs for both hardware and chemistry, or else two labs, one of each, neither of which is correct.  &#8220;The hardware and the chemistry labs,&#8221; maybe?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gibby Haynes</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-5988</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibby Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-5988</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information guys. I&#039;d like to say it&#039;s fascinating, but I&#039;d be telling porky-pies if I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information guys. I&#8217;d like to say it&#8217;s fascinating, but I&#8217;d be telling porky-pies if I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Badger</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-5967</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-5967</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me started on IBM Selectrics, Lokki. Those damned things were so good that that people used to use them as typesetting machines for litho!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me started on IBM Selectrics, Lokki. Those damned things were so good that that people used to use them as typesetting machines for litho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamfelix</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-5966</link>
		<dc:creator>iamfelix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-5966</guid>
		<description>I think the faux Nesmith above was pimping his own &lt;i&gt;brand&lt;/i&gt; of liquid corrector -- I&#039;m assuming he&#039;s faux, since he misspelled Michael.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_Paper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the faux Nesmith above was pimping his own <i>brand</i> of liquid corrector &#8212; I&#8217;m assuming he&#8217;s faux, since he misspelled Michael.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_Paper" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_Paper</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnus</title>
		<link>http://sweasel.com/archives/609/comment-page-1#comment-5965</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweasel.com/archives/609#comment-5965</guid>
		<description>If memory serves, rubber cement makes wonderful boogers. Never thought about scars. Lost opportunity.

Probably make a pretty good supernumery nipple with it if manipulated properly.

(Doing all I can to help with Google here.)

Relying once again on memory, Liquid Paper &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; white-out. Back in the day you could get a pretty good buzz from inhaling the fumes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If memory serves, rubber cement makes wonderful boogers. Never thought about scars. Lost opportunity.</p>
<p>Probably make a pretty good supernumery nipple with it if manipulated properly.</p>
<p>(Doing all I can to help with Google here.)</p>
<p>Relying once again on memory, Liquid Paper <em>was</em> white-out. Back in the day you could get a pretty good buzz from inhaling the fumes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

