web analytics

If only there was SOME kind of…visual clue

 

 

You know that montage of terrorist suspect mugshots that Michelle Malkin publishes every time there’s a new outbreak of Islamic dumbassery? It’s a great visual, but whenever I see it, I itch to Photoshop it into tidier shape.

So I did.

I know, I know — this leetle one isn’t legible. Here’s a big version (576 x 2226 and 360K) and a smaller version (300 x 1160 and 150K). Nice and color.

Feel free to suggest corrections or additions (I can’t believe the Shoe Bomber and the Panty Bomber weren’t in the original!) — and, as usual, you can steal it, edit it (.psd file available on request, ~6 megs), forward it to your favorite anti-profiling lefty, make it your Christmas Card for 2010. Whatever. Merry Christmas!

I walked down the list and Googled every single one of these guys to make sure I had the correct spelling and there weren’t better mugshots available, arranged in reasonably chronological order. I think it’s pretty clean, barring typos.

You know, it’s striking how many of these mooks were turned in by fellow Muslims. Notes passed to the FBI in broken English, clearly written by somebody else in the same immigrant group. Somebody who declined to join the jolly Jihad.

That’s the one thing that troubles me when I go all nanny-nanny-boo-boo on Islam. I don’t mind offending a billion people — that’s easy! And I think a big, fat dose of ridicule is exactly what these jihadi jack-holes are begging for.

But I sure don’t want to do anything to discourage those who rat out their evil brothers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sock it to me

Comments


Comment from scubafreak
Time: December 15, 2010, 11:32 pm

Yes, but I don’t see Janine (I want to lock all conservatives in concentration camps and have neurologists disect their limbic brains) Garafalo there…. 😉

 


Comment from SCOTTtheBADGER
Time: December 15, 2010, 11:43 pm

One of the Best Friends a Badger has is a Bad Rabbit’s angry girfriend. Angry girlfriends excell at dropping the dime on thier guys.

 


Comment from David Gillies
Time: December 15, 2010, 11:45 pm

Amazing how many of these scumbags are called Mohammed, or some variant, isn’t it? I notice you’re missing that Choudhry bitch who stabbed the MP.

You know the difference between Jesus and Mohammed? Jesus cuts your grass. Mohammed cuts your throat.

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: December 15, 2010, 11:47 pm

Yeah, and the guy who just asploded himself in Stockholm. I figured if I didn’t limit it to the US, I’d run out of electrons.

 


Comment from Mark Matis
Time: December 16, 2010, 12:01 am

Have you passed this along to Ms. Malkin yet? If not, do you mind if somebody does so?

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: December 16, 2010, 12:03 am

I mentioned her in a Tweet about it, but I suspect the big guys get so many tweets addressed to them that the function is worthless.

 


Comment from hemmersheim
Time: December 16, 2010, 12:51 am

spreadin the goodness

http://www.grouchyconservativepundits.com/index.php?topic=25333.msg199723#msg199723

 


Comment from Nina
Time: December 16, 2010, 1:20 am

Nice job, Stoaty.

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: December 16, 2010, 1:22 am

Heh. I was always happiest polishing somebody else’s hard work and then taking credit.

Our local grocery store was giving out DVD’s of class American cartoons today for Christmas. Max Fleisher’s Superman. Casper. Daffy Duck.

Excellent! Weird, but excellent.

 


Comment from Michael
Time: December 16, 2010, 4:01 am

Good stuff, Stoaty. It’s linked on the ONT over at Ace of Spades…..

 


Comment from Pavel
Time: December 16, 2010, 4:02 am

Looking through this most excellent montage, I am again reminded of the importance of Homeland Security assuring that we frisk little kids and blue-haired old ladies before flying.

 


Comment from MikeW
Time: December 16, 2010, 4:42 am

Hmm, I guess you can add Muhammad Teshale to your gallery. One look at his picture and ya gotta wonder how this guy managed to get a driver’s license let alone a job driving an airport shuttle bus. I’m sure the invesigation will determine that he’s just another poor victim of Sudden Jihad Syndrome.

PS. I think the gallery might be best if it were done in reverse chronologic order; adding newbies at the top. Oh, and what about the old blind Sheik and Bake who was involved with the first World Trade Center bombing.

 


Comment from David Gillies
Time: December 16, 2010, 5:11 am

MikeW: what this really needs is a browsable web-based interface and someone with the time, energy and developer chops to build and maintain it. WikiJihad, perhaps.

 


Comment from Blue Octopi
Time: December 16, 2010, 7:08 am

Hello Stoaty, from a longtime lurker.

Do you have a paypal account or some other mechanism if some of us want to contribute to your Bacchanal fund? Not sure how it works in furrin territories… but your efforts definitely deserve some sort of filthy lucre reward…

 


Comment from SCOTTtheBADGER
Time: December 16, 2010, 7:46 am

Goof Old Daffy Duck! I have read that both he and Donald are so popular because both of them are someone everyone can relate to. Niether duck is really in control of the forces in life acting on him, Donald in particular. I can certainly identify with that!

 


Pingback from Tweets that mention S. Weasel — Topsy.com
Time: December 16, 2010, 9:09 am

[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by joanofargghh, Stoaty Weasel. Stoaty Weasel said: Did a little P'shop tidy-up on @michellemalkin 's excellent montage of jihadi mugshots http://bit.ly/ibdtsR […]

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: December 16, 2010, 1:06 pm

Thank you kindly, Blue Octopi. I don’t have a PayPal account yet, and I’ve been hesitating, hoping someone would come up with a better idea. The tipjar concept really bothers me, for reasons I can’t quite put my finger on.

I’ve hit a few tipjars, back in my days of employment, but there’s something…unsatisfactory about it.

 


Comment from steve
Time: December 16, 2010, 2:02 pm

Conspicuously absent:
John Allen Muhammad & Lee Boyd Malvo, the “Beltway Snipers”

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: December 16, 2010, 2:22 pm

Oh, well done, steve! I knew I was forgetting something…

 


Comment from David Gillies
Time: December 16, 2010, 4:47 pm

Amazing how our supine MSM still fails to accurately ascribe the snipers to the Sudden Jihad Syndrome category.

Also missing: Hesham Mohamed* Hadayet, the scumbag who murdered two people at the El Al ticket counter at LAX on July 4 2002. And what about that dude who shot up the Jewish community centre?

* there it is again! It’s almost like there’s some common factor at work here

 


Comment from scubafreak
Time: December 16, 2010, 6:41 pm

Don’t know if anyone had him, but Director Blake Edwards has assumed room temp this morning….

 


Pingback from Terrorist Montage « Bad to the Bohn
Time: December 16, 2010, 8:26 pm

[…] SWeasel via […]

 


Comment from Deborah
Time: December 16, 2010, 8:55 pm

Stoaty—is the new snow storm going to hit you and Uncle Badger?

 


Comment from Some Vegetable
Time: December 16, 2010, 8:59 pm

I’ve tried this analysis on some of my liberal friends with disappointing results:

1. Is someone who attacks you an enemy? Yes/No
2. Is someone attacking us? Yes/No
3. Is it justified to defend yourself from someone who is attacking you? Yes/No
4. If more than one person attacks you is is justified to defend yourself from those persons? Yes/No
5. Is there some distinct common characteristic that the people attacking us share? Yes/No
6. Is this characteristic common to only this group? Yes/No
7. If those persons share a distinct common characteristic can they be considered a group? Yes/No
8. If the group attacking us can be identified by this characteristic, can we recognize them and identify them? Yes/No
9. If an identified group is attacking you, should you take action to defend yourself from that group? Yes/No
10. If others who are not part of this identified group are not attacking you, do you need to defend yourself from them? Yes/No

For some reason at this point my liberal friends start to claim that young muslim men will disguise themselves {as old nuns or blonde American children}.

When I ask for examples they change the subject.

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: December 16, 2010, 9:11 pm

It’s not supposed to, Deborah. It’s predicted to be rain down in the Southeast. But the temperature is touch and go.

And you don’t know that, Scoob. It takes a surprisingly long time to assume room temperature. The preferred method of checking is to make a small incision and insert a thermometer into the center of the liver.

So unless you have done that, Mister Smartypants, you can’t blithely make that assumption.

And no. No one had Blake in the Dead Pool.

 


Comment from scubafreak
Time: December 16, 2010, 10:19 pm

Meh. My prefered method has always been one of those combo fork/thermocouple deals that they sell for BBQ users 😉

 


Comment from Subotai Bahadur
Time: December 16, 2010, 11:43 pm

Stoaty,

Be careful of a late night knock on the door from the PC police for that bit of illustrated truth. The UK just got weirder than I could previously conceive of re: Islam. I offer this.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-152361/The-Red-Cross-bans-Christmas.html#ixzz18GIAmlB9

Apparently, the UK Red Cross has several hundred of what I think are like our Goodwill or Salvation Army stores for used goods. They have explicitly banned any expression or activity that acknowledges ….. Christmas. And they, once again, explicitly give as the reason that any expression of Christmas may offend Muslims.

My first thought was they’d better change their name. Muslims are not big fans of crosses of any kind, and I think that red ones [like the cross of St. George] especially gets their goat.

The second was how I would love it if there was a spontaneous boycott of the stores so that they would not get that £20 million a year. Stupidity like that deserves to be penalized. But I grant, such is not the British way.

Stoaty, if the outbreak of “pre-emptive surrender” becomes pandemic over there; grab Uncle Badger and come back to the States. We are fighting many of the same enemies over here … but we ARE at least fighting back.

n.b: Your Humble Servant is not a Christian of any of the multiple variants, so this opinion is not proselytizing on their behalf. But, by the mitochondrial DNA of whichever Deity is turning the Crank this week; in the Western world this IS the Christmas season, and Christians expressing their faith and joy in the season harms no one and brightens the world. Someday, we need to give our Political Classes an object lesson in the concept that Censorship ≠ Tolerance.

Subotai Bahadur

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: December 16, 2010, 11:47 pm

Oof! That happens with the Red Cross every year. It’s the Daily Mail’s annual Christmas Special :)

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: December 17, 2010, 12:08 am

Hm. I think I’ll add the mugshots from your suggestions (thanks again) and then put a link into the sidebar to whatever the latest and greatest version is.

 


Comment from j2
Time: December 17, 2010, 1:25 am

Stoaty;
nice!
this is PERFECT follow up to Who’s Doin’ What…

however, you need to be turned in for being a ….. RACIST!!!!

(keep up the good work! cheers. :))

 


Comment from Rich Rostrom
Time: December 17, 2010, 6:27 am

Mark Steyn noted the “Mohammed” theme a while back; besides the jihadis, there’s Mohammed Skaf, Lebanese-Australian gang-rape leader.

“it’s striking how many of these mooks were turned in by fellow Muslims.”

Yeah – apparently there was a lot of information on the Baltimore wanna-bomber from Moslems who knew him.

We get a lot of help from Moslems; I wish some of the “anti- jihad” flamers would notice that.

 


Comment from Rich Rostrom
Time: December 17, 2010, 6:56 am

“any expression of Christmas may offend Muslims.”

Like the £7 million Christmas tree in Abu Dhabi?

The pathetic thing is that a lot of this pre-emptive surrender isn’t even wanted – average Moslems aren’t as reactive as the PC brigade imagines. All this does is encourage the jihadists and Islamists.

I further note that a good many of the demands from accommodation come from professional Islamists, not from the Moslems allegedly offended or inconvenienced.

For instance, you may remember a fuss about Somali cab drivers in Minneapolis objecting to transporting dogs. It wasn’t the cab drivers who objected; it was some “Moslem activist”. When someone asked the drivers, they said they had no problem.

But the PC brigade reflexively grants authenticity to the most hostile outsiders. They think all “real” Indians/blacks/Moslems/Hispanics/Aborigines are filled with righteous rage at white people.

 


Comment from Sean M.
Time: December 20, 2010, 11:20 am

OOH! You’re a bad, nasty racist and you shouldn’t post such things ever ever EVAR.

Meanwhile, people are stoned to death for being gay or suspected of cheating on their husbands.

Nothing to see here.

 

Write a comment

(as if I cared)

(yeah. I'm going to write)

(oooo! you have a website?)


Beware: more than one link in a comment is apt to earn you a trip to the spam filter, where you will remain -- cold, frightened and alone -- until I remember to clean the trap. But, hey, without Akismet, we'd be up to our asses in...well, ass porn, mostly.


<< carry me back to ol' virginny