web analytics

Trying to be helpful

You must have seen this today: the words journalists aren’t allowed to use when talking about Hillary. On account of they are sexist or something. This per an unofficial group of Hillary supporters, who may or may not by now realize what a shit-awful mistake it was.

The words are: polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident, secretive, “will do anything to win”, “represents the past”, “out of touch”.

Could they have offered a more obvious list of what they see as their candidate’s most glaring weaknesses? Jesus, people are stupid.

But not us. We’re smart. And helpful. I’ll be we can come up with a lot lot more words and phrases journalists need to eschew when describing Hillary. I’ll start.

Castrating bitch. Butch. Crusty pantsuit. Cankles. Dessicated hag. Lying piece of shit. Harpy. Hambeast. Shrew. Battleaxe.

C’mon — it’s fun!

p.s. Soon as she throws that tattered hat in the ring, I’m’onna try again to make one of my Hillary! posters go viral. This is my hour. I can feel it!


Comment from rickinstl
Time: March 26, 2015, 11:14 pm


Comment from Admiral Painter
Time: March 26, 2015, 11:38 pm

Ok, so Hillary lacks ambition and isn’t very confident?

Comment from CrabbyOldBat
Time: March 26, 2015, 11:40 pm

Felon. Tw@twaffle. Bossy. (That’s from last year’s list of things one cannot say.) Down-twinkles.

Comment from PatAZ
Time: March 27, 2015, 1:06 am

Senior citizen. Yeah, that fits.

Comment from p2
Time: March 27, 2015, 1:11 am

inept, incompetent, unqualified, not maggie thatcher, uglier and more left than karl marx, looks better with a beard….

Comment from Steamboat McGoo
Time: March 27, 2015, 1:22 am

Pol-Skank pretty much sums it up.

Gawd that pic is nasty. Brrr.

Stoaty, you related to H.R. Giger or sumpin?

Comment from Stark Dickflüssig
Time: March 27, 2015, 1:34 am



Comment from Some Vegetable
Time: March 27, 2015, 1:51 am

Psssst! Hillary is the Bob Dole of the Democratic Party

Pass it on…..

Bets on whether or not she picks an openly gay man for VP?

Comment from Stark Dickflüssig
Time: March 27, 2015, 2:34 am

Bets on whether or not she picks an openly gay man for VP?

Surely it’s not constitutional for Barky to run as VP, is it?

Oh, what am I even saying? Like he would give a shit.

Comment from Deborah HH
Time: March 27, 2015, 3:29 am


Comment from Paula Douglas
Time: March 27, 2015, 3:38 am

Coattail-riding power-lusting fascist ratbag.

Comment from J.S.Bridges
Time: March 27, 2015, 3:48 am

Pol-Skank pretty much sums it up.

I am so stealing that – can’t improve on perfection, evah, no-how, no-way…

Gawd that pic is nasty. Brrr.

In-Deed…Stoaty, dear, if you’re searchin’ for a “Go-Viral” Das HillaryBeest anti-campaign pic, you need not search further; dollink, that one’s every bit as virus-based as you have need of and/or The IntarToobs can likely stand…Talk ’bout making strong men weep, brave wimmins projectile-whoopsy and small chilluns and animules run and hide…Clearly, you Got It In One!

Those eyes, those eyyyeeezzz! – they burnz us!!

(That lightning’s a very nice touch, as well…)

Comment from Erin
Time: March 27, 2015, 4:08 am

You had me at hambeast.

Comment from Anonymous
Time: March 27, 2015, 11:47 am

She’s already GOT a beard, p2.

You just can’t see it because she keeps it covered up. Thank God!

Comment from StPatrick_TN
Time: March 27, 2015, 3:27 pm

How has nobody mentioned “frigid” yet?

Comment from Wolfus Aurelius
Time: March 27, 2015, 3:43 pm

“Walker-based,” perhaps. “Tonight the Democratic Party’s walker-based candidate huffed her way up on stage . . .”

Cankle Queen.

Vox Day called her The Lizard Queen some years ago. He suggested that if she won the Presidential election, instead of a victory speech she would bite the heads off live kittens at the podium.

Comment from Anonymous
Time: March 27, 2015, 10:25 pm

As I understand it, StPatrick_TN, she is not particularly “frigid” when Huma is “servicing” her with that ten-foot vibrating pole…

Comment from Scubafreak
Time: March 27, 2015, 11:02 pm

Eh, I’m pretty much ignoring it. This is, after all, the same movement that has demanded that White gay Men stop acting like Black Women because ‘cultural appropriation’ or somethin…

Comment from Scubafreak
Time: March 27, 2015, 11:03 pm

Oh, not to mention that they have decreed that Clapping in applause is now verboten, and all PC thinking humans must now substitute Jazz hands..

Comment from Uncle Al
Time: March 28, 2015, 12:37 am

So, they are so stupid that they simply object to these words but not their meanings. I guess they never ran across synonyms.

polarizing – alienating
calculating – plotting
disingenuous – less than honest
insincere – misleading
ambitious – ruthless
inevitable – fated
entitled – condescending
over-confident – arrogant
secretive – recondite
will do anything to win – obsessed
represents the past – antique
out of touch – aloof

Comment from currently
Time: March 28, 2015, 7:13 am

The heck with words not allowed, let’s make them come up with sentences that are sexist or something. That will keep them busy. Example (hat tip Luther):

“You are like mouse-droppings in the pepper. Listen, you ass, you are a particularly crass ass, indeed, you are a filthy sow!”

Write a comment

(as if I cared)

(yeah. I'm going to write)

(oooo! you have a website?)

Beware: more than one link in a comment is apt to earn you a trip to the spam filter, where you will remain -- cold, frightened and alone -- until I remember to clean the trap. But, hey, without Akismet, we'd be up to our asses in...well, ass porn, mostly.

<< carry me back to ol' virginny