So it begins…
Saddle up, here we go heading into the 2016 election (or as bloggers call it Easy Pickin’s Season).
If you missed this weekend’s bonus Photoshop, do feel free to spread it around should you find it worthy. I’ve seen it in the wild once already, which feels me with deelight. (Forgot to sign it, tho).
That was a Photoshopper’s dream: a strong, simple idea, lots of big hi-res photos to choose from, close correspondence between the thing and the thing you’re morphing it into. Mutilating poor old Chelsea was so easy; the hard part was eliminating the type in the original Elle cover. Thanks again to RD Brewer for sending me the idea.
Hillary! isn’t so easy, but if ever aristocrat needed mocking…
Posted: April 13th, 2015 under personal, photoshop, politics.
Comments: 7
Comments
Comment from Malcolm Kirkpatrick
Time: April 13, 2015, 10:05 pm
Those high-contrast “Ready for Hillary” images (here, for example) remind me of nothing else so much as the John Tenniel version of the Cheshire cat, fading away until there was nothing left but the grin.
Comment from Nina
Time: April 14, 2015, 2:23 am
#definitelynotreadyforhilary #oranydemocratforthatmatter
Comment from mojo
Time: April 14, 2015, 2:35 am
Big Mother Is Watching
Comment from Anonymous
Time: April 14, 2015, 3:01 pm
Somebody on Iowahawk’s Twitter, maybe he himself, said that “Hillary is so old, when she went to college, you could major in Pelts.”
Comment from Professor Algebriarty
Time: April 14, 2015, 7:12 pm
Bringing Teh Maths to the Weaselblog is like showing up at some cat show decked out in Robin Hood getup with a quiverful of pointy shafts.
The odds of having a $1,000 fruitfully multiply to $100,000 in 10 months by prudent and inspired investments in cattle futures is 1 in 31 trillion.
How dare the deniers insinuate that Hillary does not have the insight, skill and talent to lead ‘Murka to prosperity.
Not only that, even her erstwhile opponents admit she is likeable enough. Maybe Joltin’ Joe Biden will step in to pull security.
I am in!
Comment from Rich Rostrom
Time: April 19, 2015, 12:29 am
“Aristocrat”???
What is there “aristocratic” about her? Money, but she is nouveau-riche, utterly lacks style or manners, has no family background, and shows not a trace of noblesse oblige.
Write a comment
Beware: more than one link in a comment is apt to earn you a trip to the spam filter, where you will remain -- cold, frightened and alone -- until I remember to clean the trap. But, hey, without Akismet, we'd be up to our asses in...well, ass porn, mostly.<< carry me back to ol' virginny