sweasel.com

Assange probably coordinated this whole pile with The One and his toadies. The Muslim in Chief has no concern about his image. The grovelling media will rehabilitate that post-haste. And as you said, this does diss Hillary. Which is clearly in the best interest of the Head Nagger What’s In Charge.

The main thing we get from this bunch of WikiLeaks is confirmation of the pre-existing belief that the State Department is inhabited entirely by futile, petty, nadless twits.

Regards,
Ric

Heh. It’s just occurred to me. The fact that three million people have access to those cables is probably WHY there’s nothing shocking in them.

Leaks aren’t always giant document dumps, after all. People love to be in the know and share a bit of inside information. Even good people with their country’s best interests at heart.

Speaking of the president’s twelve-stitch-lip — has anyone checked Michele’s knuckles?

Hm. Of course, now that many governments have reason to be angry at Assange, it’s safer to assassinate him.

JESUS! BBC news has just said this database of cables goes back to *1966*.

Fucking hellski.

And they’re starting with this weak shit from 2010?

Anyone mention here that Leslie Nielsen passed away the other day? Damn. He was hilarious.

Stoaty… the picture is still Hillary ously 2012. Are you working for her???? (eyebrow lifted…)

🙂

Next Question:
where’s the joke in “ASS ANGE”..?

(btw: truly laughing at your ability to capture the true retard in BHO… nice job (can you say “chowda head”)

I caught a quick bit of Fareed Zakaria on King’s show on CNN while channel-surfing saying that nine hundred thousand people in the US have Top Secret clearance. There’s obviously tension between the free flow of information between government entities and compartmentalisation in the name of security (maybe if there’d been a little less of that we’d have picked up the 9/11 hijackers earlier) but I think it’s arguable the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction. Apparently the State Department has gone all huffy and de-friended DoD.

I’m personally waiting for the hillarity that would ensue when one of the cables says “Yeah, Iraq had WMDs, but we took too long getting there, so he had time to hand them off to Syria…”

This being spun as damaging to Hillary makes me suspicious, and why would an army PFC have access to State Department cable traffic?

It doesn’t look like traffic, it looks like archives. Especially if it goes back to 1966.

Calling them “cables” is a bit odd. I wonder how long it’s been since they were actually cablegrams. I guess that’s just the nomenclature.

Why embassy cable traffic in particular? It’s all very strange.

Stoaty, one of the things that was discovered after 9/11 was that Federal agencies didn’t talk to one another. In some cases (the “Gorelick Wall”) that was deliberate policy, in others it was bureaucratic turf-protection. As a result, stuff got missed that might have made a difference. The Word went out from On High: Thou Shalt Communicate, Dammit! Of course no two such agencies had the same database structure or security standards, and in many cases there were several such structures within a given agency. True to bureaucratic form, they said the Hell with it and opened the channels.

Note that this is exactly the sort of stuff you’d hand to the lowest-grade analyst around — boring, repetitive, and near-nil information density. In an intelligence agency, that’s what enlisted or their civilian equivalent are for. You do not want to waste your higher-grade people trolling through muck like this for the one nugget in ten tons of useless sand. The scandal isn’t that Manning had access to it. The scandal is that they didn’t have anything in place to detect and frustrate mass downloads. For one thing, why did he have a CD writer on his computer in the first place?

Regards,
Ric

I agree, it’s unlikely that there will be found a proverbial smoking gun of malfeasance in the message traffic. What will arise though, and will take a little longer to suss out, is a general tone of cluelessness and incompetence of people operating in some closed environments, such as the White House.

BHO & Krewe seem to mistake the public comments of foreign leaders for their actual feelings about things. To wit:
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/308827.php

[…] question comes up again and again, mostly in comments. Really, though, there’s no […]

Slate has a piece on “cables.” Basically, a message to one specific person is an email. A cable is more of a broadcast, intended to be seen by more than one person.

Bay of Pigs was the last time Western Union handled embassy messaging.

For Ric Locke:

He’s a Preferred Species. How do you think they’d be able to deny him that?

Ric Locke: “…confirmation of the pre-existing belief that the State Department is inhabited entirely by futile, petty, nadless twits.”

SF writer Keith Laumer had served in the Diplomatic Corps. Later he had a very long series of short stories and novels about Retief, a “galactic diplomat” in the Corps Diplomatique Terrestrienne. Retief was an ultra-cool superstudly dude surrounded by careerist hacks with names like Straphanger, Hidebinder, Earlyworm, Treadwater, and Pinchbottle.

I once heard Laumer say “Any resemblance between the Corps Diplomatique Terrestrienne and the U.S. State Department is completely intentional and a damn shame!”

Our local radio guy says this makes Hillary look good. Why look how she is mining info on UN peoples. Isn’t that what we are supposed to be doing, spying and collecing data on the furriners?

Er…with Hillary? Remember the FBI files she gathered/put together on her fellow citizen ‘enemies’? Remember the private citizens getting audited for speaking ill about her princess self? Now, of course you should gather info on those on the ‘outside’ but would she use it for the good of our national security or the good of her bank acct/campaign stash?

*thinks about her friends and donors, the Chicoms, the Saudis, etc*

I dunno. Whenever I see this crap, I see a picture in my head straight out of “Road Warrior” with the big guy in the hocky mask and his little girly boy, but the girly-boy is assange, and hockey mask is George Soros…….

I think I need intense psychotherapy……. ;-(

The more I hear about this, and the DEMANDS the Hillary resign, the more sure I am that the reason people are leading with the more recent stuff is to kill a Hillary in 2012 push.

Scubafreak – I don’t know if you need therapy, but you do need to watch “The Road Warrior” again.

The guy in the hockey mask is the Lord Humongous, ruler of the wastelands, the Ayatolla of Rock and Rolla.

The guy with the girly boy is the Wez, the number one underling and attack dog for the Humongous.

The fact that I know this information probably indicates that I’m the one needing therapy, or more alcohol.

Rich: You forgot Ambassador Grossblunder in the Retief stories. And the lovely secretary Miss Braswell.

How much is a Second Class stamp? http://www.zoji.com/1230673 non nude lolitas toplist I kept waiting for one of them to fall down the stairs. WTF why are you fucking there? I could see if you started up the stairs but you had it all planned out with the camera.

I’m sorry, he’s http://community.parents.com/asumouooi/blog/2013/04/04/lolita_kingdom_nude_pics lolitas preteens 14 15 i love hearing the man going off like that if you guys know other ones like that let me know

I’ll put him on crazy lolitas top list shes so fucking sexy shes flawless and she does dp like a pro very good video only problem is its not me with her there

Which team do you support? lolita pant preteen models Who the **** is this guy?Oh please why did he have to ruin all the fun?On the other hand..the MILF…She is so hot…SO SO HOT…Love her…yummi

Punk not dead underage lolita jailbait nude smoking doiesnt turn me on to be honest its a big turn off !!