web analytics

You’re welcome

backhair

Yeah, it’s getting increasingly hard to find things to say that aren’t the election or the EU referendum. I’d’ve given you a cat picture instead, but I was too lazy to camera.

sock it to me

Comments


Comment from Uncle Badger
Time: February 24, 2016, 10:47 pm

Yes, I confess. That one star was from me.

And it was only because they don’t do a zero stars option.

Moar katz plz!

 


Comment from Ric Fan
Time: February 24, 2016, 10:53 pm

I read back in 1999 that very few male actors have hair on their chests because they all had to adopt the “twink” look per the gaystapo.

 


Comment from Gromulin
Time: February 24, 2016, 11:01 pm

The Italian comb-over: starts below the shoulders.

 


Comment from Steamboat McGoo
Time: February 24, 2016, 11:03 pm

What Badger said. That second One Star was mine.

After yesterday’s photo of the Britney Blabberer Buggerboy and today’s Fuzzy Neanderthal, I’m fleeing to Soylent Siberia just to reaffirm my gender and orientation.

 


Comment from Skandia Recluse
Time: February 24, 2016, 11:04 pm

That (the picture) is not human.

 


Comment from J.S.Bridges
Time: February 24, 2016, 11:16 pm

Kinda kinky-ugly, there…

Had a guy lived down the dorm hallway a few doors when I was a mid-level undergrad who had that sort of bodily “excrescence”, both back and front – except…he had that reddish-sandy-hair – and some all-over freckling as well (at least, I took it on faith it was all-over – never ‘zactly personally verified that part, if you catch my drift…). Liked to roam around minus shirt, wearing flip-flop sandals – tops of his feet, ankles, legs also perty-thick-fuzzed.

Didn’t get to know him real well, but I gathered he had some – issues – with getting dates…seemed quite possible.

Also, found out (unfortunately, from personal experience) one did not wish to sit too close to him in, say, the context of a dorm-room card game, as he became established as a Silent-But-Deadly occasional-intestinal-gas emitter…

‘Nuff said – apologies, if any consider that to be “too much information” (wouldn’t want to “trigger” anyone into a pursuit of “a safe space”, y’know?).

Unfortunate fella, I’d say…”hirsute” is probably about the kindest term you can use for that.

I confess to having given that third One-Star rating – how about another chooks-post? Or moar katz stuff? What’s the Orange Terror up to these days?

 


Comment from J.S.Bridges
Time: February 24, 2016, 11:29 pm

BTW, Ric Fan, there may be something in what you said, but from quite some time back I do recollect being told on pretty good authority that quite a lot of male actors maintain(ed) the no-chest/back-hair deal because that is/was an exemplar of youth, which is/was considered to be a very important part of the “image” – remember, for the most part, acting is still very much a “glamor” business, and a youthful look is part-and-parcel of “glam”.

 


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: February 24, 2016, 11:38 pm

Yeah, yeah. Keep the one-stars coming!

Wouldn’t you really rather have rampant back hair than Boris Johnson or The Donald? Speaking of bad hair in the news…

 


Comment from Uncle Badger
Time: February 24, 2016, 11:54 pm

No point trying too rescue your street cred by dragging in the topical Trump, your Stoatliness!

We knows a desperate post… when it has back hair all over it (and it doesn’t miaow)

 


Comment from Ric Fan
Time: February 25, 2016, 12:04 am

J.S.Bridges: Do actors in their early 20s really need to look young?

 


Comment from Ric Fan
Time: February 25, 2016, 12:31 am

Duh. I rethought my answer. They want actors to look like twinks. Therefore, they want young actors to look underage, so off comes the hair!

 


Comment from Mitchell
Time: February 25, 2016, 12:44 am

That guy’s a piker. My older sister dated a short wookee for a while.

 


Comment from feynmangroupie
Time: February 25, 2016, 12:52 am

I’m so fed up with the twink/genderless/girly peniled-set that I actually don’t even mind a hirsute man. Granted I would have recoiled in horror way back in my youth, but now I almost want to give them all a huzzah.

 


Comment from mojo
Time: February 25, 2016, 1:17 am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRHqs8SffDo

 


Comment from mojo
Time: February 25, 2016, 1:22 am

found this too:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ViwvgtvbA

 


Comment from Subotai Bahadur
Time: February 25, 2016, 2:49 am

With all due respect, I would rather have posts about Boris Johnson [is there a Natasha Johnson?] and the arguing and airborne bovine excrement over Brexit than an ambulatory hairball. Or cats. Or chickens. Or hedgehogs [I am given to understand that Brits like hedgehogs.].

 


Comment from dissent555
Time: February 25, 2016, 4:09 am

No, this isn’t about Boris Johnson either –

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3qhle8Oy9s

obligatory for this topic and someone of my advanced age and privileged cultural upbringing

 


Comment from mojo
Time: February 25, 2016, 4:39 am

https://youtu.be/BV7AfWxKxyQ?t=15

 


Comment from Deborah HH
Time: February 25, 2016, 4:47 am

Tom Selleck—sigh—Sam Elliott—sigh—James Garner—big sigh—Sean Connery—sigh.

 


Comment from Some Vegetable
Time: February 25, 2016, 3:32 pm

She asks me why, I’m just a hairy guy
I’m hairy noon and night, hair that’s a fright
I’m hairy high and low, don’t ask me why, don’t know
It’s not for lack of bread, like the Greatful Dead, darlin’

Let it fly in the breeze and get caught in the trees
Give a home to the fleas, in my back hair
A home for fleas, a hive for the buzzing bees
A nest for birds, there ain’t no words
For the beauty, splendor, the wonder of my back hair

Flow it, show it Long as God can grow it, my back hair

I want long, straight, curly, fuzzy, snaggy, shaggy, ratty, matty
Oily, greasy, fleecy, shining, gleaming, streaming, flaxen, waxen
Knotted, polka dotted, twisted, beaded, braided
Powered, flowered and confettied
Bangled, tangled, spangled and spaghettied!

 


Comment from Larry Talbot
Time: February 25, 2016, 5:23 pm

Comment from Skandia Recluse
Time: February 24, 2016, 11:04 pm

That (the picture) is not human.

Don’t say that, man!

 


Comment from bad cat robot
Time: February 26, 2016, 1:32 am

Wait, James Garner was fuzzy? *ponders* OK, for him I might make an exception. But the wooly mastodon up yonder needs shearing. And what microencephalitic twit thinks it is a great scientific insight that upper back hair matches with lower back hair? I have never in my born days ever heard of a back-hair mullet, have you?

 


Comment from M
Time: February 26, 2016, 10:15 pm

I like hairy men. Not THIS hairy but I’d rather have a guy with a bit of back hair than a man with no chest hair. Ick. Why do so many British actors have no chest hair? Do they all shave?

 


Comment from Bane
Time: February 28, 2016, 11:38 pm

Disabled toilet.

 

Write a comment

(as if I cared)

(yeah. I'm going to write)

(oooo! you have a website?)


Beware: more than one link in a comment is apt to earn you a trip to the spam filter, where you will remain -- cold, frightened and alone -- until I remember to clean the trap. But, hey, without Akismet, we'd be up to our asses in...well, ass porn, mostly.


<< carry me back to ol' virginny