web analytics

Tee hee

 

 

 

Is this true? It’s true enough for a weasel!

A site called breatheheavy.com claims the ‘true’ picture was emailed to them by somebody from the shoot. (Beware: my browser gave me a phishing warning while I was poking around that site).

Thing is, one of them has to be fake. And — speaking in my capacity as Photoshoppiste extraordinaire — whichever one is fake is really, really well done. So hats off to the pixel pusher!

Bieber embarrassed. Hostage-taking Muslim nutcakes dead. This weekend is shaping up to be a little happier than it might have been.

Happy Friday, all!

 

 

 

Comments


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: January 9, 2015, 8:53 pm

Also, this gif, because it makes me happy:

Best use of a GoPro EVAR.


Comment from Deborah HH
Time: January 9, 2015, 9:42 pm

I’m mesmerized by those paws.


Comment from J.S.Bridges
Time: January 9, 2015, 10:49 pm

Da BatCat!!


Comment from Bikeboy
Time: January 9, 2015, 11:36 pm

Could BOTH of the Biebergraphs be “embellished”? Inquiring minds want to know. Interesting that a merchandiser would choose a washed-up teen idol, whose only current claim to fame is as a misdemeanorer, as their underpants model. What demographic are they going after here?


Comment from dissent555
Time: January 9, 2015, 11:48 pm

I saw a blurb this morning on a French news feed (DNA) that Fidel Castro had finally bought the finca. Seems this was in error.

Too bad.


Comment from S. Weasel
Time: January 9, 2015, 11:50 pm

I know, dissent55. There was some African guy named Fidel Castro Booblyboo (or something) who recently died and confused Twitter. Twitter is a very stupid animal.


Comment from Nina
Time: January 10, 2015, 12:08 am

I do not like the tattoos.

Who is that again?

Mmmmft. Forgive my pissiness. I know it’s Friday but after two great weeks in Norway a week of students just set my teeth on edge. And I’m exhausted. And hungry. And I just do not get Beiber.

Pffft


Comment from QuasiModo
Time: January 10, 2015, 12:09 am

Kitteh!


Comment from Stark Dickflüssig
Time: January 10, 2015, 12:55 am

Inquiring minds want to know. Interesting that a merchandiser would choose a washed-up teen idol, whose only current claim to fame is as a misdemeanorer, as their underpants model. What demographic are they going after here?

Housewives who buy underpants for their girlfriends’s grandkids?


Comment from EZnSF
Time: January 10, 2015, 2:21 am

The perfect icon for today’s world.
A complete dipshit, photoshopped, selling crap.

Today’s da Vinci’s David.
Mass produced in a small Chinese city.


Comment from Stark Dickflüssig
Time: January 10, 2015, 5:03 pm

Oh Lord, how long until a new post pushes down that twitching beaver pic. Lord, how long?


Comment from Argentium G. Tiger
Time: January 12, 2015, 7:30 pm

Stark:

Use AdBlock Plus and block the one specific image (being sure not to block the images from the rest of the site, as Stoatie’s stuff is usually gold.)

No waiting required.

Write a comment

(as if I cared)

(yeah. I'm going to write)

(oooo! you have a website?)


Beware: more than one link in a comment is apt to earn you a trip to the spam filter, where you will remain -- cold, frightened and alone -- until I remember to clean the trap. But, hey, without Akismet, we'd be up to our asses in...well, ass porn, mostly.


<< carry me back to ol' virginny